Lawsuit against Ken Paxton explains why Texans can’t access certain face filters on Facebook and Instagram right now – The Gilmer Mirror

By Reese OxnerThe TexasTribune

Lawsuit against Ken Paxton explains why Texans can’t access certain face filters on Facebook and Instagram right nowwas first published by The Texas Tribune, a nonprofit, nonpartisan media organization that educates — and engages with — Texans about public policy, politics, government and issues in the world. statewide.

Subscribe to La Brèveour daily newsletter that keeps readers informed of Texas’ most essential news.

Certain Instagram face filters will not be available in Texas at this time.

Meta, the parent conglomerate of Instagram and Facebook, quietly disabled augmented reality filters on its platforms across the state on Wednesday. The decision comes two months after the Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton sued the Californian company, claiming that certain company practices and features violated the privacy of Texans. The lawsuit is part of ongoing disputes between Texas officials and social media companies.

Disabled filters are 3D overlays that change a user’s appearance or add accessories such as hats, facial hair, or cartoonish dog ears and muzzles. Other Instagram filters that only change lighting or add tints to photos remain available.

Meta officials said they would add an option for Texans to reactivate their individual accounts in the service later. According to the lawsuit, about 20.5 million Texans used Facebook last year.

In his lawsuit, Paxton said Meta violated a Texas law that prohibits how certain biometric data — physiological characteristics such as fingerprints, eye IDs and, in this case, facial features — is collected. . The attorney general said the lawsuit could lead to hundreds of billions of dollars in civil penalties for Meta. The lawsuit also accuses the company of deceptive marketing practices.

Meta officials said so stopped its facial recognition program last year and planned to delete the data of more 1 billion users. The decision came after the Federal Trade Commission fined Meta in 2019 for a record $5 billion for consumer privacy violations.

Paxton alleges the company used data from Facebook and Instagram filters to power its face-tracking software — a claim Meta denies — and asked a state court to ensure the company retains relevant data for the lawsuit, which has not yet been tried.

Meta Press representatives dispute that its facial recognition features have anything to do with its tagging software, but said it suspended filters in Texas and Illinois to “prevent baseless litigation and distracting” that are “based on a misinterpretation of how our features work”. The company pointed out that the Instagram filters it suspended in Texas on Wednesday do not use facial recognition software.

“The technology we use to power augmented reality effects like avatars and filters is not facial recognition or any technology covered by the laws of Texas and Illinois, and is not used to identify who whatever,” Meta said in a statement.

A group of Illinois lawyers were the first to sue Facebook over its collection of biometrics in 2015 in a class action lawsuit. The group struck a deal with the social media giant last month for $650 million. Users who participated in the class action will receive $200 to $400 after checks are mailed May 9.

Paxton filed his trial in Harrison County State Court on the first day of early voting in the March primary as he vied for the Republican nomination to retain his post as attorney general. Paxton has been charged since 2015 and is being questioned by the FBI over how he runs his office, but has denied any foul play. He will face the Land Commissioner George P Bush in a Second round of the May 24 elections.

This isn’t the only area where Texas has targeted social media companies. A recent victory for Republican lawmakers came on Wednesday when a federal appeals court reinstated a Republican-backed Texas law which prohibits major social media companies from banning users of their political viewsa reaction to what Republicans call anti-conservative bias.

Conservatives have renewed their criticism of social media companies and targeted them in legislation after former President Donald Trump was banned from Twitter for breaking the platform’s rules on inciting violence during the January 6, 2021 riot at the United States Capitol.

Disclosure: Facebook financially supported The Texas Tribune, a nonprofit, nonpartisan news organization that is funded in part by donations from members, foundations and corporate sponsors. Financial supporters play no role in the journalism of the Tribune. Find a suit list here.

Tickets are on sale now for the Texas Grandstands Festival 2022, taking place in downtown Austin from September 22-24. Get your TribFest tickets before May 31 and save big!

This article originally appeared in The Texas Grandstand to

The Texas Tribune is a nonpartisan, member-supported newsroom that informs and engages Texans about politics and state politics. Learn more at